The omission of captain Andrew Strauss from England's provisional 30-man squad for the ICC World Twenty20 tournament in June was not a surprise. National selector Geoff Miller has said that Strauss accepts he is "not comfortable" in the super-short format of the game.
Like it or not though, Twenty20 cricket now makes up a substantial part of the cricket calendar, both in the form of internationals and in domestic competitions like the Indian Premier League. Is there any place in the game these days for an England captain who is "not comfortable" with the twenty-over game?
Twenty20 cricket is taking over. All the big money is in the IPL, and the ICC seems intent on fitting as many Twenty20 matches and tournaments into the calendar. The argument that having a different captain in the 50-over game to the Test arena causes problems, as neither can truly stamp his authority on the team, may well become increasingly relevant to the 20-over format as well.
The foundation of success, not just in cricket but in any sport, is continuity in selection. Since 1985, the very successful Australia have had four permanent captains- Border, Taylor, Waugh and Ponting- and although they have had some periods where the captain of the ODI team has been different to the Test captain, there has always been a sense that the next captain is being groomed.
England's history of captains in the same period is very different and it is commendable that England have now decided to choose Andrew Strauss as captain in both Tests and ODIs, rather than attempting to juggle two captains. It is true that the Twenty20 window in the cricket calendar offers Strauss some respite from the stressful job, and England are not alone in making huge changes to their sides for Twenty20 competitions.
However, Ricky Ponting, captain of Australia, skippers the side in all three forms of the game. There is absolutely no confusion as to who is the leader and when Michael Clarke is forced to deputise, Australia are something of a different team. Conversely, Graeme Smith, captain of South Africa and who captained in his country's first few Twenty20 games, has not skippered the side in the super-short format for the last 15 months and in that period South Africa have nearly knocked Australia off their perch as the number one Test nation.
So is it just a case of Ricky Ponting and MS Dhoni being suited to the Twenty20 game, while other Test and ODI captains are simply "not comfortable"? It is hard to believe that Mike Atherton or even Nasser Hussein would have been good Twenty20 players, so perhaps one should not make a big deal of who is Twenty20 captain.
It has been shown in cricket history that it is not essential for an international side to have the same captain for all forms of the game, but there is a strong case that the same figurehead and leader across the board can improve the chances of success. The question is, should Andrew Strauss, who is "better suited" to longer forms of the game, captain the England Twenty20 side, not necessarily on merit but for the greater good?
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts
Monday, 6 April 2009
Friday, 6 February 2009
CRICKET: What todays multi-milion auction means...
Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff hit the headlines again this morning, but unfortunately not for their performances in the First Test against the West Indies in Jamaica. Both have fetched approximately £1.1 million each in the second Indian Premier League auction in Goa. But what exactly does this mean?
The India Premier League will run for six weeks in April/May. It is a Twenty20 tournament of 8 franchised teams, which are based in cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Therefore all players remain on contracts at the home clubs, in England or South Africa or Australia for instance, but their services are bought for the duration of the tournament, for a certain number of years. The players are auctioned to the highest bidder, but each franchise has a budget. Most players were auctioned last year, on contracts of more than one year. With a limit of ten foreign (non-Indian) players per squad, most franchises already had seven or eight such players.
Therefore, all the attention was on Freddie and KP, because no franchise was likely to take on a foreign player unless he was a world class player. However, the pair can only play for three weeks of the six-week tournament, so they only earn half of the auction fee: about £550,000. That is still over £180,000 a week; eat your heart out Robinho. However, because the players are released from their central contract with the England Cricket Board for those three weeks, they are technically contracted to their respective counties- Lancashire and Hampshire respectively- for that time. And the counties want compensation.
The compensation was set at 10% of their fee, which for Flintoff and Pietersen is £55,000 each. Not bad for missing one County Championship match. Paul Collingwood, the other centrally contracted England player, was bought for $275,000, so Durham can expect about £15,000. Collingwood was not the third most expensive England player though. All-rounder Ravi Bopara fetched $450,000. These are massive sums, so one can understand the English players scrambling to be part of it.
The IPL was exciting last year, and will undoubtedly be enhanced by Flintoff and Pietersen, as well as South African JP Duminy who has had a superb recent series against Australia and was auctioned for just shy of $1,000,000. What is more in doubt, is the preparedness of England's two best players for the First Test against the West Indies at Lords in May, after bashing the ball around in a Twenty20 tournament for three weeks. Is five days is long enough to get back into Test mode or does it not matter when you bat like Kevin Pietersen or Andrew Flintoff? Only time will tell.
The India Premier League will run for six weeks in April/May. It is a Twenty20 tournament of 8 franchised teams, which are based in cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Therefore all players remain on contracts at the home clubs, in England or South Africa or Australia for instance, but their services are bought for the duration of the tournament, for a certain number of years. The players are auctioned to the highest bidder, but each franchise has a budget. Most players were auctioned last year, on contracts of more than one year. With a limit of ten foreign (non-Indian) players per squad, most franchises already had seven or eight such players.
Therefore, all the attention was on Freddie and KP, because no franchise was likely to take on a foreign player unless he was a world class player. However, the pair can only play for three weeks of the six-week tournament, so they only earn half of the auction fee: about £550,000. That is still over £180,000 a week; eat your heart out Robinho. However, because the players are released from their central contract with the England Cricket Board for those three weeks, they are technically contracted to their respective counties- Lancashire and Hampshire respectively- for that time. And the counties want compensation.
The compensation was set at 10% of their fee, which for Flintoff and Pietersen is £55,000 each. Not bad for missing one County Championship match. Paul Collingwood, the other centrally contracted England player, was bought for $275,000, so Durham can expect about £15,000. Collingwood was not the third most expensive England player though. All-rounder Ravi Bopara fetched $450,000. These are massive sums, so one can understand the English players scrambling to be part of it.
The IPL was exciting last year, and will undoubtedly be enhanced by Flintoff and Pietersen, as well as South African JP Duminy who has had a superb recent series against Australia and was auctioned for just shy of $1,000,000. What is more in doubt, is the preparedness of England's two best players for the First Test against the West Indies at Lords in May, after bashing the ball around in a Twenty20 tournament for three weeks. Is five days is long enough to get back into Test mode or does it not matter when you bat like Kevin Pietersen or Andrew Flintoff? Only time will tell.
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
CRICKET: IPL prepares to auction the soul of English cricket
It has been widely reported in the last couple of days that Kevin Pietersen is likely to 'bought' in the IPL auction for a record fee, eclipsing the $1.5 million paid for the services of Indian wicketkeeper MS Dhoni in last year's inaugural auction. The Indian Premier League, a competition of Twenty20 cricket between 8 franchised teams in India, runs for a six-week period in April/May every year. Players are auctioned off before the tournament to the highest bidding franchise.
The IPL is backed by a variety of multi-millionaire Indians and has seen unprecedented amounts of money pumped into it. For six weeks work, some of the players can earn more money than they would have previously earned in six years.
It is not difficult to understand, then, why every top cricketer in the world wants to play in this competition. Even those commentators of a purist view concede that the players cannot be blamed for wanting to play in the IPL. Twenty20 cricket is undoubtedly exciting and attracts bigger crowds and television audiences than Test cricket. It is also more attractive to advertisers, who will pay more money for adverts during the games.
Indeed, there are many winners in this new era of Twenty20 cricket. Obviously, all of the players involved are earning the kind of money never before seen in cricket. The organisers are very happy with their attractive product; the advertisers are delighted to be associated with it. And with high viewing figures, everyone seems to be a winner.
There is at least one high profile loser: English cricket. English cricket's soul will be sold off next week in the IPL auction.
And while it is being sold, the England cricket team will be half way through the First Test against the West Indies in Jamaica. Are the players minds going to be 100% on the game as the tough arena of Test cricket requires? Or are the top England players going to be desperate to get off the field to ring their agent and find out who they will be playing for in India, and more importantly, for how much?
The ECB gave in to the demands of both the IPL top brass and England players by releasing them to play for three weeks of the six-week IPL tournament, instead of the originally proposed two-week release. The result of this, is that the players who do play, certainly Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff, and possibly a few others, will arrive back from three weeks of Twenty20 crash-bang-wallop with only 5 days until the first Test match of the summer, again against the West Indies. It is not exactly good preparation for a summer which includes the highly-anticipated Ashes.
The IPL is changing the face of cricket and hence affecting every country in the Test arena. But the effects are far more acute in England because the IPL runs at the start of our cricket season. No other nation has this problem, indeed many others, including Australia and South Africa, are just winding down their seasons in April, so the IPL is in a perfect window. Not for us though.
Twenty20 cricket will march on in the coming years, especially in the form of the rival Premier League in England, which is to be bankrolled by Texan billionaire Sir Allen Stanford. But cricket tours of 4 or 5 Tests with ample preparation time for both teams is likely to be a thing of the past. In England's case, the future is likely to be a few Twenty20 slogs in preparation for five-day game. RIP English cricket.
The IPL is backed by a variety of multi-millionaire Indians and has seen unprecedented amounts of money pumped into it. For six weeks work, some of the players can earn more money than they would have previously earned in six years.
It is not difficult to understand, then, why every top cricketer in the world wants to play in this competition. Even those commentators of a purist view concede that the players cannot be blamed for wanting to play in the IPL. Twenty20 cricket is undoubtedly exciting and attracts bigger crowds and television audiences than Test cricket. It is also more attractive to advertisers, who will pay more money for adverts during the games.
Indeed, there are many winners in this new era of Twenty20 cricket. Obviously, all of the players involved are earning the kind of money never before seen in cricket. The organisers are very happy with their attractive product; the advertisers are delighted to be associated with it. And with high viewing figures, everyone seems to be a winner.
There is at least one high profile loser: English cricket. English cricket's soul will be sold off next week in the IPL auction.
And while it is being sold, the England cricket team will be half way through the First Test against the West Indies in Jamaica. Are the players minds going to be 100% on the game as the tough arena of Test cricket requires? Or are the top England players going to be desperate to get off the field to ring their agent and find out who they will be playing for in India, and more importantly, for how much?
The ECB gave in to the demands of both the IPL top brass and England players by releasing them to play for three weeks of the six-week IPL tournament, instead of the originally proposed two-week release. The result of this, is that the players who do play, certainly Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff, and possibly a few others, will arrive back from three weeks of Twenty20 crash-bang-wallop with only 5 days until the first Test match of the summer, again against the West Indies. It is not exactly good preparation for a summer which includes the highly-anticipated Ashes.
The IPL is changing the face of cricket and hence affecting every country in the Test arena. But the effects are far more acute in England because the IPL runs at the start of our cricket season. No other nation has this problem, indeed many others, including Australia and South Africa, are just winding down their seasons in April, so the IPL is in a perfect window. Not for us though.
Twenty20 cricket will march on in the coming years, especially in the form of the rival Premier League in England, which is to be bankrolled by Texan billionaire Sir Allen Stanford. But cricket tours of 4 or 5 Tests with ample preparation time for both teams is likely to be a thing of the past. In England's case, the future is likely to be a few Twenty20 slogs in preparation for five-day game. RIP English cricket.
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
CRICKET: Another retirement as Australia continue to go through transition
The retirement from international cricket of Matthew Hayden was not a complete surprise. His exclusion from the squad for the upcoming one-day series against South Africa, despite being the ICC one-day player of the year in 2007 and Australian one-day player of the year in 2008, indicated that the selectors were going pick by form and Hayden would not be allowed to play through to this summer's Ashes on reputation.
With this summer's big series in mind, the retirement of Australia's most succesful opening batsmen; a man who set a world record individual score of 380 against Zimbabwe during his career, can be placed in the context of a far greater sea change in Australian international cricket.
Since Australia's 5-0 whitewash of England 2 years ago, Hayden, who averaged 50.73 in test matches, is the second batsmen to retire after an illustrious record-breaking career. Wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist, who retired this time last year, reinvented what it meant to be a wicketkeeper-batsmen, scoring 100 sixes in his career, as well as the second fastest test hundred, off only 57 balls, and averaging 47.60.
Australia have also lost the attractive batting of Damien Martyn along with Justin Langer, who as opening partner with the retiring Hayden, struck up with the latter, the second best opening partnership of all time, scoring 5,655 runs together at an average of 51.88 for the first wicket.
In the batting department, however, Australia have coped quite well in the wake of these retirements, especially in the form of Michael Hussey. Hussey has been a revelation in world cricket, currently averaging just below 60 in 34 tests and a quite amazing 57.13 in ODIs (one-day internationals), the latter being an astonishing record, as many of the greatest batsmen have failed to break the 50 barrier for an average in one-day cricket.
Michael Clarke has moulded himself into a vice-captain and Andrew Symonds has proved that, when not causing on- and off-the-field headaches for the administrators, he is not just a one-day player, but a very useful Test all-rounder.
The Aussies recent 2-1 series defeat to South Africa was their first on home turf since they lost by the same margin to a Mike Gatting-led England in 1986-1987. 22 years unbeaten was a very impressive record. The series against the Proteas that led to the demise of the unbeaten record, was characterised not necessarily by lacklustre batting, although the batter's failed to show their usual dominance at home, but infact by the bowling.
Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath, both of whom have very strong cases for being included in a Greatest Ever Australian XI, retired from Test cricket in the last Ashes series with their farwell test at the SCG in January 2007. They left an impossible void to fill and Australia's inability to even come close to replacing the pair was ruthlessly exposed by the South Africans.
Sure, Australia have some good bowlers. Left-armer Mitchell Johnson has really shown his worth in the last two series; against India in the sub-continent before Christmas and against Graeme Smith's South Africa over Christmas time. He has bowled with accuracy, swing and sometimes genuine pace.
However, Australia have really missed the injured Stuart Clark, another man who has come to the fore since the 2005 Ashes series. Brett Lee, who was left as the experienced leader of the attack with the retirement of McGrath and Warne, looked very ineffective in the last two series, taking 8 wickets at 61.62 runs each in India and only a solitary wicket for 249 runs in two tests against South Africa.
Stuart MacGill, the leg-spinner who spent his career in the permanent shadow of Warne, failed to perform after the latter's retirement, and has now retired himself despite an impressive record of 208 Test wickets in only 44 matches. Given the number of wickets taken by Warne during the Ashes in England in 2005, this must count as a massive void that South Africa have expolited, and England must look to target during the summer.
And so, the upheavals in Australian cricket should point to England having a good chance at taking back the Ashes on home turf, especially as Marcus Trescothick and Ahley Giles are the only two players from the 2005 side to have retired for England.
But the last two weeks have shown that when it comes to the England cricket team, if it is not one thing it is another, and the diverse range of characters within the dressing room seem to have fought a power struggle, the result being the sacking of Peter Moores as coach at Kevin Pietersen as captain. England seem determined to give the transitional Australia as good a chance as possible, by shooting themselves in the foot during the run-up to the Big One this summer.
With this summer's big series in mind, the retirement of Australia's most succesful opening batsmen; a man who set a world record individual score of 380 against Zimbabwe during his career, can be placed in the context of a far greater sea change in Australian international cricket.
Since Australia's 5-0 whitewash of England 2 years ago, Hayden, who averaged 50.73 in test matches, is the second batsmen to retire after an illustrious record-breaking career. Wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist, who retired this time last year, reinvented what it meant to be a wicketkeeper-batsmen, scoring 100 sixes in his career, as well as the second fastest test hundred, off only 57 balls, and averaging 47.60.
Australia have also lost the attractive batting of Damien Martyn along with Justin Langer, who as opening partner with the retiring Hayden, struck up with the latter, the second best opening partnership of all time, scoring 5,655 runs together at an average of 51.88 for the first wicket.
In the batting department, however, Australia have coped quite well in the wake of these retirements, especially in the form of Michael Hussey. Hussey has been a revelation in world cricket, currently averaging just below 60 in 34 tests and a quite amazing 57.13 in ODIs (one-day internationals), the latter being an astonishing record, as many of the greatest batsmen have failed to break the 50 barrier for an average in one-day cricket.
Michael Clarke has moulded himself into a vice-captain and Andrew Symonds has proved that, when not causing on- and off-the-field headaches for the administrators, he is not just a one-day player, but a very useful Test all-rounder.
The Aussies recent 2-1 series defeat to South Africa was their first on home turf since they lost by the same margin to a Mike Gatting-led England in 1986-1987. 22 years unbeaten was a very impressive record. The series against the Proteas that led to the demise of the unbeaten record, was characterised not necessarily by lacklustre batting, although the batter's failed to show their usual dominance at home, but infact by the bowling.
Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath, both of whom have very strong cases for being included in a Greatest Ever Australian XI, retired from Test cricket in the last Ashes series with their farwell test at the SCG in January 2007. They left an impossible void to fill and Australia's inability to even come close to replacing the pair was ruthlessly exposed by the South Africans.
Sure, Australia have some good bowlers. Left-armer Mitchell Johnson has really shown his worth in the last two series; against India in the sub-continent before Christmas and against Graeme Smith's South Africa over Christmas time. He has bowled with accuracy, swing and sometimes genuine pace.
However, Australia have really missed the injured Stuart Clark, another man who has come to the fore since the 2005 Ashes series. Brett Lee, who was left as the experienced leader of the attack with the retirement of McGrath and Warne, looked very ineffective in the last two series, taking 8 wickets at 61.62 runs each in India and only a solitary wicket for 249 runs in two tests against South Africa.
Stuart MacGill, the leg-spinner who spent his career in the permanent shadow of Warne, failed to perform after the latter's retirement, and has now retired himself despite an impressive record of 208 Test wickets in only 44 matches. Given the number of wickets taken by Warne during the Ashes in England in 2005, this must count as a massive void that South Africa have expolited, and England must look to target during the summer.
And so, the upheavals in Australian cricket should point to England having a good chance at taking back the Ashes on home turf, especially as Marcus Trescothick and Ahley Giles are the only two players from the 2005 side to have retired for England.
But the last two weeks have shown that when it comes to the England cricket team, if it is not one thing it is another, and the diverse range of characters within the dressing room seem to have fought a power struggle, the result being the sacking of Peter Moores as coach at Kevin Pietersen as captain. England seem determined to give the transitional Australia as good a chance as possible, by shooting themselves in the foot during the run-up to the Big One this summer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
